Legal Opinion

Sexton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1994No. 94-03167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s order compelling him to provide reciprocal discovery of matters pertaining to the penalty phase of this capital case. He essentially contends that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220 does not apply to the penalty phase of a trial. We disagree and concur with our sister court’s holding in Booker v. State, 634 So.2d 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Petition denied.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Booker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sturge v. LCS Development Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Bailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. State v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994