Legal Opinion

(PC) Beaton v. Valley State Prison

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 14, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00005Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00005-LJO-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF 13 v. ) LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 VALLEY STATE PRISON, ) [ECF No. 1] ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Paul Nivard Beaton is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed January 2, 2020. 20 I. 21 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 22 The Court is required to screen complaints…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API