Legal Opinion

Fangman v. Moyers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 23, 1932No. 13,028PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as the district and Gray; defendant in error, Billy Moyers, as Billy, and his father and next friend as Moyers.

Billy brought injunction against the district to restrain it from excluding him from school privileges at the Hooper High School, and against Gray, the district’s bus driver, to restrain him from denying the necessary transportation. To review a judgment entered against them the district and Gray prosecute this writ and ask that it be made a supersedeas.

Moyers, a lawyer, came to Alamosa from Georgia in September, 1930, rented a room in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. . RyallNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. State ex rel. School District No. 1 of Waukesha v. ThayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McNish v. State ex rel. DimickNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hudson v. MattingleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pauley v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lujan v. Colorado State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Cline v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Cline v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Cline v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API