Legal Opinion

Wadsworth v. Wadsworth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1963No. 521PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

Appellee contends, and the court below concluded, that the purported sale of the timbea’ to. appellee at the price of $23,821.22 is void for failure of the clerk to- malee orders of resale vesting the commissioner with .authority therefor.

There are certain absolute prerequisites oif a valid judicial sale. “. . . (I)t iis necessary, in order that a judicial ©ale may be validly made, that the court by which it was ordered shall have the general power to decree a sale, and that in a particular case the jurisdiction of the court over the subject matter and parties shall have been acquired in -a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Henry J. Heryey & Co. v. EdmundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Stancill and Gay v. . GaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Ryder v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. County of Franklin v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Bolick v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Shaw v. WolfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. In re the Estate of KessingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API