Legal Opinion

Megins v. Pary

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 1898No. Nos. 11,163-(52)Published

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Otter Tail county, in favor of defendants, entered in pursuance of. the findings and order of Searle, J.

1Opinion of the Court

CANTY, J.1

This is an action on a promissory note dated October 5, 1893, for $2,350, made by defendants to the order of plaintiff. On the trial before the court without a jury, the court made its findings of fact, and ordered judgment for defendants. From the judgment entered thereon, plaintiff appeals.

*1141. From the findings and admissions in the pleadings, it appears that on November 22, 1889, the defendant Olaf Pary was indebted to plaintiff; in the sum of $2,000, and on that day executed his note to plaintiff for that amount; that this note remained unpaid on July 24, 1893, on which day Pary,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. National German-American Bank v. WilderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API