Legal Opinion

Connell v. Chandler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Travis.

1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.

The only question in this case is, on the right of the administrator of Mitchison to impeach the deed pro*6-cured by the intestate for the negro girl sued for, to his chil-dren, on the ground of fraud against creditors.

In the case of Dancy and others v. Smith and others, (6 Tex. R. 411,) a strong intimation, as an obiter, was thrown out, that an administrator could do so for the benefit of creditors ; it was a question not presented by the case, and subsequent reflection satisfied us that it was erroneous, and that the fraud of the intestate could not be set up by his administrator j and we so…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Hart v. RustTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Wilson v. DemanderTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Blackman v. SchiermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. First Nat. Bank of Eldorado v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API