Connell v. Chandler
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Travis.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
The only question in this case is, on the right of the administrator of Mitchison to impeach the deed pro*6-cured by the intestate for the negro girl sued for, to his chil-dren, on the ground of fraud against creditors.
In the case of Dancy and others v. Smith and others, (6 Tex. R. 411,) a strong intimation, as an obiter, was thrown out, that an administrator could do so for the benefit of creditors ; it was a question not presented by the case, and subsequent reflection satisfied us that it was erroneous, and that the fraud of the intestate could not be set up by his administrator j and we so…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Hart v. RustTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Wilson v. DemanderTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Blackman v. SchiermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- First Nat. Bank of Eldorado v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.