Legal Opinion
Soelter v. King County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1997No. 96-35823Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
132 F.3d 40
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Sonia SOELTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KING COUNTY, a Municipal Corporation; Gary Locke, County
Executive, Individually and in his official capacity; Pearl
McElheran, Deputy Executive for Administration of King
County, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-35823.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 1997.
De…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William Fazio v. City and County of San Francisco Arlo SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Soelter v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1996