Legal Opinion

Heyse v. Michalske

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided July 1, 1940No. 278104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BREWER, J.

This case is presented to the Court on the petition for a declaratory judgment filed by Albert E. Heyse, administrator of the estate of his father, Ed-nest F. Heyse, deceased.

Defendants are: the administrator of the estate of Louisa Heyse, deceased, the alleged widow of Ernest F. Heyse, deceased, and the unknown heirs of. Louisa Heyse, deceased.

Ernest F. Heyse married Louise Heyse in the City of Cleveland on the 18th day of February, 1904, the license to marry having been obtained from this Court. In applying for the license, Louisa Heyse represented her mother’s maiden…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MacHucaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Osoinach v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. McIlvain v. ScheibleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of StilesOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Walker v. WalkerLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API