Legal Opinion

Maddox v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1911No. 3392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari; from Putnam superior court — Judge J. B. Park. March 23, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. Evidence of the good character of the accused should be considered by the jury, in connection with all the other pertinent evidence tending to establish his guilt or innocence; and a charge to this effect was not erroneous in failing to state that evidence of good character alone might be sufficient to generate in the minds of the jury a reasonable doubt. Fordham v. State, 125 Ga. 791 (54 S. E. 694) ; Brazil v. State, 117 Ga. 32 (43 S. E. 460).

2. In the absence of a timely written request, it is not error (as has been repeatedly held by this court and the Supreme Court) for the judge to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brazil v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Fordham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Strickland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Shropshire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Booker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Middlebrooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API