Legal Opinion

Neaterour v. Holt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1989No. 4-89-0067PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE McCULLOUGH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Alma Neaterour appeals a summary judgment order entered for defendant, Dr. William Holt, pursuant to section 2 — 1005 of the Civil Practice Law (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 1005). The trial court found plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations as set forth in section 13 — 212 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 13 — 212). Plaintiff contends issues of fact remain disputed; therefore, summary judgment was improper. Alternatively, plaintiff argues her action is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Pantle v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Estate of WhittingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hollander, Jacque v. Brown, JamesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Hertel v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Sille v. McCann Construction Specialties Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Daly v. CarmeanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API