Moore v. Robison
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 55, April T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., March T., 1906, No. 735, on verdict for plaintiff in case of John F. Moore v. William Robison. Assumpsit for work and labor. Before Ford, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $532.80. Defendant appealed. - , Errors assigned were various portions of the charge. M. L. Avner, with him S. S. Robertson, for appellant.—
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beavek, J.,
The appellee invokes the application of our rule No. XV as to the first, second, fourth and fifth specifications of error. The rule is: “When the error assigned is to the charge of the court, or to answers to points, or to findings of fact or law, the part of the charge or the points and answers-or findings referred to must be quoted totidem verbis in the assignment.” The first and second assignments relate to points to which the answers are not quoted *74in the assignments. The fourth and fifth assignments relate to separate points, in which the answers are given but the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sargeant v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Schenkel v. Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Neff v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Benseman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Belber Trunk & Bag Co. v. SilberblattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sahm v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912