Legal Opinion

Mack v. Patchin

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided December 15, 1864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This was an action to recover damages for the breach of covenant for quiet enjoyment, in a lease for a term of years. It was tried before Hasten, Justice, and a juiy. Tlie jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff for nineteen hundred and forty-one dollars. The general term ordered judgment for the plaintiff upon the verdict. The facts of the case and the questions raised by the exceptions taken at the trial, are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court, Hasten, J.

This case comes before us on exceptions taken upon the trial, and ordered to be heard in the first instance at the general term. . A brief statement of the facts will enable us to understand and consider the exceptions. The defendant being seized in fee of a certain lot of land with a brick warehouse thereon, and a dock in front thereof, situate in the .city of Buffalo, let them to the plaintiff on the first day of January, 1861, by lease in writing bearing date that day, and signed and sealed by both parties, for the term of six years, at a specified yearly rent to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baxter v. RyerssNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rotter v. GoerltizNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
  2. Burgener v. O'HalloranAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920
  3. Johnson v. OppenheimThe Superior Court of New York City · 1872
  4. Johnson v. OppenheimThe Superior Court of New York City · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API