Legal Opinion
Rodrigue v. Copeland
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1985No. Nos. 84-CA-572, 84-CA-573PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLIEBERT, Judge.
This appeal arises out of an action by Herbert Rodrigue, Burton Klein and Mary Borrell (neighbors of one of the defendants) to enjoin the defendants, Alvin C. Copeland (Copeland) and Popeyes Famous Fried Chicken, Inc., from continuing to operate a lighting display during the Christmas season at Mr. Copeland’s home. The trial judge refused to grant the injunction but imposed so-called restrictions on the operation of the display.
On appeal the plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in failing to find the display was a nuisance and in violation of numerous Jefferson Parish…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodrigue v. CopelandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Rodrigue v. CopelandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985