Legal Opinion

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Safeway Const. Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 25, 1947No. 5663PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINBERGER, District Judge.

The plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant from the use of the word “Safeway” in the conduct of the defendant’s construction business or otherwise.

This case does not involve a trademark infringement. The wrong complained of is an unfair trade practice, so-called “unfair competition” by the defendant in using said plaintiff’s trade name.

The evidence establishes that since 1926 plaintiff, or its predecessors, have continuously owned and operated an extensive grocery business under the name of “Safeway” in Los Angeles and elsewhere in California, and in other states…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Incorporated v. Safeway Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. a & P Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. A. & P. Trucking Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Safeway Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. Safeway Stores, Incorporated v. Safeway Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API