Legal Opinion

VanUden v. Hendricksen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1980No. 80-90PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, Ravalli County, which granted partial summary judgment against plaintiffs and denied a motion for summary judgment against defendants in a contract for deed dispute.

Plaintiffs Herman H. VanUden and Delores M. VanUden purchased real property on a contract for deed from defendants Stanley C. Hendricksen and Maxine J. Hendricksen. Restrictive covenants affecting the property were recorded prior to the time of signing a contract for deed. Plaintiffs initiated this action to remove the effect of the covenants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harland v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kober v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Silloway v. JorgensonMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Roope v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kosel v. StoneMontana Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allers v. WillisMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Berens v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Morales v. TuomiMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Thomas v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Cady v. BurtonMontana Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API