Legal Opinion

Schindler v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1958No. Civ. 9479; Civ. 9481PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. *

Petitioners in each of the above-entitled matters apply for writs of mandate to compel the respondent court to order the pretrial inspection of certain statements made by each to the district attorney or his representatives, also of certain medical specimens, and of the reports made by the autopsy surgeon concerning his findings as the result of an autopsy performed on the body of their deceased daughter. They also seek authorization to engage a pathologist of their own choice at county expense and to have the body of the child exhumed for further autopsy examination.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. United States Ex Rel. Smith v. BaldiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Powell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  5. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. DemesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. United States v. AycockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API