Jones v. Vanzandt
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
McLEAN, Circuit Justice.
It is proper, first, to ascertain the precise character of the motion. By some of the counsel, in the argument, it has been treated as a demurrer to the evidence; but it can not be so considered. No demurrer has been filed, and should the motion be overruled the defendant intends to examine witnesses. A demurrer to the evidence takes the case from the jury; the facts proved are admitted to be true, and, also, every legal inference that can be drawn from them favorable to the plaintiff. The motion is not, technically, for a nonsuit. Such a motion would not be granted by…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HinkleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Jones v. Van ZandtSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Nolan v. ShickleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
- Summerall v. ThomsSupreme Court of Florida · 1850
- Lewis-Williams v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026