Legal Opinion
(PC) Dukes v. Chau
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 2, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00486Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARNELL MAURICE DUKES, No. 1:25-cv-00486-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT 13 v. (ECF No. 12) 14 JAMES CHAU, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis n this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on April 28, 2025. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint, 21 filed June 30, 2025. (ECF No. 12.) 22 I. 23 DISCUSSION 24…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Gladys N. Waller, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Lyon v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Yates v. Auto City 76District Court, N.D. California · 2013