Legal Opinion
Livingston v. South Dakota State Medical Holding Co.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 20, 2006No. Civ. 04-4139PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KORNMANN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
[¶ 1] Plaintiffs brought suit against Danielle Livingston’s (“Livingston”) employer, Wakonda Heritage Manor (“Manor”), and Manor’s group health insurance carrier, South Dakota State Medical Holding Company, Inc. (“DakotaCare”), challenging DakotaCare’s denial of group health insurance benefits to Livingston and her newborn baby, contending that the denial violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), as amended by the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1161-68…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Page v. JP Morgan Chase Bank (In re Page)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013