Legal Opinion
Morris v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided December 26, 1968No. Docket No. 407-68UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Meyer Morris and Arlene D. Morris v. Commissioner.
Morris v. Commissioner
Docket No. 407-68.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1968-295; 1968 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 5; 27 T.C.M. (CCH) 1558; T.C.M. (RIA) 68295;
December 26, 1968, Filed
Meyer Morris, pro se, 270 List Ave., Rochester, N. Y. David H. Julian, for the respondent.
DAWSON
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
DAWSON, Judge: Respondent determined income tax deficiencies against the petitioners for the taxable years 1963 and 1964 in the amounts of $420.23 and $1,361.40, respectively. Two issues are presented for decision: (1) Whether petitioner…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ullman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Michaels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
- Annabelle Candy Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Thrifiticheck Service Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Maurice L. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marsh & McLennan Incorporated v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Schelble v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- S. S. Ballin Agency, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Marsh & McLennan Incorporated v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- S.S. Ballin Agency, Inc., in No. 19035 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Tax Court Docket No. 6225-66). S.S. Ballin Agency, Inc., and Subsidiary Company, in No. 19036 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Tax Court Docket No. 6226-66). Joseph Delman and Jeanette Delman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in No. 19037 (Tax Court Docket No. 932-67)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971