Legal Opinion

Frye v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1936No. Civ. No. 10281PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an original application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court from executing its order made on June 18, 1936, and from making any other orders affecting two minor children. The petitioners herein are Mary Frye, the maternal grant-aunt of said minors, and Neil Speer and Jaqueline Speer, the said minors, for whom said Mary Frye was appointed guardian ad litem for the purpose of this proceeding.

Said minors, who are of the ages of 12 and 10 years, respectively, are the illegitimate children of Hazel Speer Kavanaugh, deceased. It is alleged in the petition that each of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Leach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Struck v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. August Belmont & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Peebler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API