Snyder v. Scheidt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Plaintiff’s first assignment of error is that the court erred in its conclusion of law because the second conviction was on 20 December, 1955, more than one year after 15 June, 1954, the date of the first conviction. Plaintiff’s contention is interesting but unsub stantial. G.S. 20-17(6) deals with “two charges of reckless driving committed within a period of twelve months.” (Italics added.) The date of the offense, not the date of the conviction, is the determinative factor.
Plaintiff’s second assignment of error is general, that is, directed to the judgment. With reference thereto,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harrell v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simpson v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Baggett v. PetersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980