Baugh v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Thomas
Affirming.
The appellant, Forest Baugh, was convicted in the Muhlenberg circuit court of the offense denounced in section 1214 in the 1930 edition of Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes — i. e., seducing a woman under 21 years of age under promise of marriage — and the verdict punished him by confinement in the penitentiary for one year. On this appeal his counsel argues as grounds for a reversal: (1) Incompetent evidence introduced by the commonwealth over defendant’s objection; (2) insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and for which reason…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- McCreary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Commonwealth v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
- Commonwealth v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garrison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Blackburn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949