Gilbert v. Auster
Wisconsin Supreme Court
iAppeal from an order of tlie circuit court for Ashland county: Joins' K. PaRish, Circuit Judge. The appeal is from an. order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. Among other references upon the part of the appellant were the following: Newton v. Marshall, 62 Wis. 8, 21 N. W. 803; Hunger-ford v. Bedford, 20 Wis. 345; Gulf. G. '& S.. F. B. Co. v. Ciarle, 101 Eed. 618; Dillingham v. Fisher, 5 Wis. 475; Shiver v. U. S. 159 U. S. 491, 16 Sup: Ct. 54; Wadleigh v. Marathon Go.
Read the full summary
iAppeal from an order of tlie circuit court for Ashland county: Joins' K. PaRish, Circuit Judge. The appeal is from an. order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. Among other references upon the part of the appellant were the following: Newton v. Marshall, 62 Wis. 8, 21 N. W. 803; Hunger-ford v. Bedford, 20 Wis. 345; Gulf. G. '& S.. F. B. Co. v. Ciarle, 101 Eed. 618; Dillingham v. Fisher, 5 Wis. 475; Shiver v. U. S. 159 U. S. 491, 16 Sup: Ct. 54; Wadleigh v. Marathon Go. Bank, 58 Wis. 546, 17 N. W. 314; Peyton v. Desmond, 129 Eed. 1; Kralcow v. Wille, 125 Wis. 284, 103 N. W. 1121. * Among…
1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.
It appeared from the amended complaint demurred to that on January 14, 1902, the respondent Emil Auster, at the United States land office at Ashland, Wisconsin, made a timber and stone cash entry under the laws of the United States of the southeast quarter of section 33, in township 46 north, of range 9 west. A patent by the United States to the said Auster was issued November 13, 1905. January 15, 1902, Auster and wife executed to the plaintiff a warranty deed of said land in the form authorized by sec. *5832208, Stats. (1898). By mutual místate of the parties to said deed the deed failed to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peyton v. DesmondCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Krakow v. WilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Knight v. LearyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Gilbert v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Gunsolus v. LormerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blaha v. BorgmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Illinois Steel Co. v. KonkelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Knapp v. Alexander-Edgar, Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911