Jeter v. Shamblin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
750 So.2d 521 (2000)
Bobbie F. JETER, Plaintiff-appellant,
v.
Dr. James R. SHAMBLIN, Defendant-appellee.
No. 32,618-CA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
February 1, 2000.
Davidson, Nix & Jones by Allison A. Jones, Grant E. Summers, Shreveport, Counsel for Appellant.
Mayer, Smith & Roberts by Mark A. Goodwin, Shreveport, Counsel for Appellee.
Before GASKINS, CARAWAY and KOSTELKA, JJ.
CARAWAY, J.
In this medical malpractice action, the trial court sustained defendant's exception of prescription. The trial court held that the doctrine of contra non valentem was inapplicable in this case, and…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lima v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Reeder v. NorthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Crump v. Sabine River AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Whitnell v. MenvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of MosesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Huber v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Collum v. EA Conway Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- In Re TrahanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jeter v. ShamblinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.