Legal Opinion

Claim of Brynildsen v. Mt. Vernon Novelty Curtain Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 24, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNamee, J.

The foregoing version of claimant’s condition and acts, as given by the claimant himself and the doctors, stands undisputed and wholly unexplained, except by the bare denial of intoxication by the claimant. Although concededly there were other persons who observed claimant’s condition when he came into the hotel, and also while he was in the hospital, yet claimant testified to no fact indicating that he sought any of these as witnesses, or the evidence of the companion with whom he spent the night, and who drove claimant’s car. The Industrial Board did not find that the claimant was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Matter of Shearer v. Niagara Falls Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Shannon v. American Can Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Stephens & Stephens v. LoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API