R.M. v. Christopher J. LAROSE, et al.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 R.M., Case No.: 25-cv-3186-AGS-DEB 4 Petitioner, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE AND GRANTING MOTION TO 5 v. PROCEED PSEUDONYMOUSLY 6 Christopher J. LAROSE, et al., (ECF 2) 7 Respondents. 8 9 Petitioner challenges his immigration detention. He seeks a writ of habeas corpus 10 under
28 U.S.C. § 2241
as well as leave to proceed under the pseudonym “R.M.” 11 EX PARTE MOTION TO USE PSEUDONYM 12 “The normal presumption in litigation is that parties must use their real names.” Doe 13 v. Kamehameha Schs./Bernice Pauahi Bishop Est.,
596 F.3d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Patrick Neiss v. Pete BludworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- EW v. New York Blood CenterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Publius v. Boyer-VineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017