Legal Opinion
Bissell v. McElligott
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided December 21, 1965No. 14788-1, 14796-1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
These consolidated cases pend on defendant United States’ motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, we are also required to rule the separated issue of scope of employment.
Difficulties during pre-trial proceedings required that this case be set for hearing. The day before the hearing, however, the parties were able to enter into the stipulation that was the subject of much pre-trial discussion. That stipulation provided that “the specific issue of scope of employment [may be decided by the Court] at this time on the basis of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. EleazerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Hilsdorf v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Vert v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Riggs v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bonnie J. Bissell v. Edmond J. McElligott Etc., Sylvia Lynn Gampher v. Edmond J. McElligott Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Marjorie Bates v. United States of America, Juanita Ann Deckard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Betty Fuller FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Dorothea E. McSwain and Stella McSparran Administratrix of the Estate of Tracy L. McSwain Deceased v. United States v. Herbert L. McSwainCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Wollman v. GrossDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.