Legal Opinion

Sherbal v. Epstein

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoreto, J.

Irrespective of whether or not the landlord was responsible for the violation by causing the premises to be occupied by three families for dwelling purposes, when authorized for occupancy by two families, these summary proceedings brought seeking the eviction of one family in order to cure the violation thereby, must fail in view of the tenant’s lease with an unexpired term.

In the opinion of the court, the violation in and of itself does not invalidate the lease. Section 231 of the Eeal Property Law provides that a lease is void where the lessee or occupant of a building or premises shall use…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Park Plaza Corp. v. MonskyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  2. 941 Park Avenue Corp. v. FriedAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H. Casabianca, Inc. v. ConnobbioCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  2. Rosel Stations, Inc. v. JamesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API