Legal Opinion
Komolov v. Segal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 20, 2014PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the thirteenth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The thirteenth cause of action for unjust enrichment is precluded in this case because it seeks precisely the same relief that was barred by the statute of frauds.
Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Alskom Realty, LLC v. BaranikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Agbor v. Presidency of the Republic of Equatorial GuineaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Doe v. RoeDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Kassirer v. GotlibAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026