Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Raynor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 1992No. 91-3164PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court found appellant was the prevailing party, and indeed he was, having recovered a net judgment in his favor. See Malagon v. Solari, 566 So.2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Pappert v. Mobilinium Assocs. V., 512 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Since the contracts under which suit was brought expressly provided for the prevailing party to be awarded his attorney’s fees, it was error to ignore the contractual provision. See Lakewood on the Green Villas Ass’n v. Pomerantz, 556 So.2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Blue Lakes Apts. v. George Gowing, Inc., 464 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BLUE LAKES APT. v. George Gowing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Pappert v. Mobilinium Associates V.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Malagon v. SolariDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Lakewood On Green Villas Ass'n v. PomerantzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Financial Northwest, Inc. v. Richard Craig LaverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API