Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 6, 1949No. 9891Published

1Opinion

*125On Rehearing

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and Mc-LAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

The remaining question involved in this petition for enforcement concerned the suspension by respondents of their employee, Frederick C. Sconfienza, at the request of the incumbent union. The union had itself previously suspended Sconfienza because of, among other things, his dual unionism. The Labor Board under the then existing Rutland Court doctrine1 ordered Sconfienza’s reinstatement and that he be made whole for any pay losses he suffered by reason of respondents’ action. We agreed with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Public Service Co-ordinated TransportCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API