Ksenich v. Lorain Street Ry Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
Here we have.two distinct corporations, 'which, so far as the evidence discloses, have no relation or connection with each other, one having to do with the transaction which is the basis of the suit, and the other, so far as the evidence shows, having no connection therewith.
The Railroad Co. was not named in the petition as a defendant, and there was no service upon an agent of the Railroad Co. as such, and the Railroad Co. did not do anything to enter its appearance in the suit. The evidence does not warrant the finding that it was defending the suit in the name of the Railway Co. or that it…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Spence v. Commercial Motor Freight, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
- Van Landingham v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942