Legal Opinion
Village of Camillus v. Diamond
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., J.
Respondent, the New York State Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, has moved pursuant to subdivision (f) of CPLR 7804 to dismiss the petition which seeks an order prohibiting respondent from holding a duly scheduled public hearing. The stated purpose of the hearing is to receive evidence relevant to the proposed modification of certain prior orders made by the Commissioner relating to pollution abatement in the Village of Camillus and particularly sewage discharge into the waters of Nine Mile Creek.
It is undisputed that the Commissioner has been granted by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Livingston v. WyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Campo Corp. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Campo Corp. v. FeinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- City of New York v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Matter of City of New York v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charles v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Delford Industries, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Village of Camillus v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Central School District No. 12 v. Middle Island Teachers Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Portville Forest Products, Inc. v. Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Supreme Court · 1982