Legal Opinion

Booten v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 5, 2002No. CIV.A. 99-11229-EFHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, Senior District Judge.

The Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order barring deposition testimony concerning the acts or omissions of Dr. Thomas Rocco requires the Court to address an unusual set of circumstances involving the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988, 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (2000) (“the Westfall Act”). Because the Court rules that under the West-fall Act a plaintiff may not contest a United States Attorney’s refusal to certify that a defendant employee of the federal government was acting within the scope of his office or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States Department of Energy v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API