Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Thomas

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1852PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In error from the circuit court of Monroe county ; Hon. F. M. Rogers, judge. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice YeRgeb

The defendant in error sued Carraway, Hardy, and Williams in an action of trover for two slaves, which had belonged to John Hill, deceased, in his lifetime, and upon whose estate defendant in error had administered. The proof very clearly showed a trover and conversion of the goods by Hardy and Williams, after the death of Hill, but there was no proof to charge Carraway. The jury found a verdict against all the defendants. A motion was made for a new trial, which the court would have granted, but that the plaintiff agreed to enter and did enter a nolle prosequi as to Carraway. On the trial…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Montgomery Gas-Light Co. v. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. TrawickTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. McCool v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. De La Guerra v. PackardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Johnson v. HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API