Legal Opinion
Bell v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Bell)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1989No. 17-15122PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The instant adversary proceeding, reminiscent of two proceedings that we recently decided together in In re Adams, Adams v. Philadelphia Homing Authority, and In re Bowens, Bowens v. Philadelphia Homing Authority, 94 B.R. 838 (Bankr.E.D.Pa. 1989) (hereinafter cited as “Adams”), raises the issue of whether the Philadelphia Housing Authority (hereinafter referred to as “PHA”) deprived a debtor-tenant of due process in an eviction proceeding. In issue here is the utilization of a judgment, entered by agreement in 1985 on the basis of rent…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ca 79-3053 Publicker Industries, Inc. And Continental Distilling Corporation v. Roman Ceramics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- First Pennsylvania Bank, N. A. v. TriesterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Sudler v. Chester Housing Authority (In Re Sudler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Windsor Communications Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan (In Re Kaplan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Jones v. GE Capital Mortgage Co. (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Orsa Associates, Inc. v. MBA Financial, Inc. (In Re Orsa Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re C & C Tv & Appliance, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re F.B.F. Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.