Lynch v. Harris County
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
1. Since adoption of the Code of 1863 “it has been permissible for the defendant in ejectment to set up by way of plea any matter which would avail him in a court of equity. The filing of such a plea ipso facto converts the case into an equitable action. The plaintiff may by an amendment to his declaration set up counter equities.’? Powell on Actions for Land, 129, § 107 (see pp. 86, 88, §§ 60, 61); Code, § 37-901; Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Hughes, 105 Ga. 1 (30 S. E. 972, 70 Am. St. R. 17); Atlanta, Knoxville 105 Northern Railway Co. v. Barker,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Ryan v. KingsberySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Price v. High & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Hart v. RespessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stubbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982