Legal Opinion

Rommel-McFerran Co. v. Local Union No. 369, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1966No. 16444PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for damages brought by a general contractor as a result of picketing and a strike at a construction job. Plaintiff claims these activities constitute a secondary boycott induced by defendants in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 158 (b) (4) and § 187. Plaintiff claims defendants’ acts forced it to get rid of two nonunion subcontractors and occasioned increased costs to it in relation to the completion of a building job.

The two defendant labor organizations had no primary labor dispute with plaintiff, but they claim their activities were aimed only at the nonunion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Local 761, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United Steelworkers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. NLRB v. Servette, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, Salesmen & Helpers, Local 145Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. David A. Bryant v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Rommel-Mcferran Company, Inc. v. Local Union No. 369Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API