Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 2009No. 2D08-3951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Judge.

Michael 0. Goldsmith a/k/a Derrick Owen Goldsmith appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw plea, contending that the proceedings on remand from his prior appeal continued the violation of his right to self-representation that the first appeal sought to correct. We agree and therefore must reverse and remand for a de novo hearing on Goldsmith’s motion before a new judge.

Goldsmith was charged with robbery, attempted robbery, possession of cocaine, and opposing an officer without violence for events that occurred on November 20, 2000. After a period during which Goldsmith was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Richard T. Dorman v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Tennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  5. Kearse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldsmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API