Goldsmith v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
VILLANTI, Judge.
Michael 0. Goldsmith a/k/a Derrick Owen Goldsmith appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw plea, contending that the proceedings on remand from his prior appeal continued the violation of his right to self-representation that the first appeal sought to correct. We agree and therefore must reverse and remand for a de novo hearing on Goldsmith’s motion before a new judge.
Goldsmith was charged with robbery, attempted robbery, possession of cocaine, and opposing an officer without violence for events that occurred on November 20, 2000. After a period during which Goldsmith was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Richard T. Dorman v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Tennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Kearse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldsmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009