Pratt v. Berry

This action was commenced by reason of an accident that occurred between defendant driver and the seven-year-old plaintiff pedestrian. Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict of no cause of action.

Plaintiff raises three issues for review, all dealing with jury instructions.

In determining whether error has been committed, we must consider the instructions as a whole to determine if they fully represent the law applicable to the case, Lake Oakland Heights Park Association v. Township of Waterford (1967), 6 Mich App 29; St. Louis v. Fisher & Company, Inc. (1965), 1 Mich App 55; Huffman v. First…