State ex rel. Merchants National Bank v. Hull
Supreme Court of Florida
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the-court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabry, C. J.:
This is a proceeding by mandamus instituted in this court to compel a clerk of the Circuit Court to grant an order for the sale of personal property seized under writs of attachment, on the ground that the property was perishable, liable to great deterioration in value, and the cost of keeping some of it was greatly disproportionate to its value.
The alternative writ shows that in December, 1895, the Merchants National Bank instituted two suits at law against one Isadore Grrunthal, and at the same time writs of attachment were sued out and levied upon certain personal property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fox v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Allen, Ball & Co. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Bloxham v. Consumers' Electric Light & Street RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gough v. DorseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hoopes v. CraneSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Wilson ex rel. Otis v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Variety Children's Hosp., Inc. v. PerkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Shop in the Grove, Ltd. v. UNION FED. S. & L. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Reese v. DamatoSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.