Legal Opinion

Arine v. McAmis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1979No. 50454PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

This is an appeal by Robert McAmis from a judgment in favor of Jacqueline Arine, Appellee, allowing her to rescind a contract to purchase his quarter horse mare, LaGo-Go, and recover damages. The mare was acquired for breeding purposes and was later found to be incapable of conceiving.

Appellee Arine first purchased the mare for $5700.00 at a horse auction conducted by Haymaker Sales Co., Inc., relying on an announcement from the sale ring that the mare was in foal. Subsequent examination by a veterinarian disclosed that she was not in foal and appellee called McAmis and advised…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of America v. Independent Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Ionic Petroleum, Limited v. Third Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Campbell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Richard Hefley and Kent Martin D/B/A Agri Investment Services v. Harry JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Octagon Resources, Inc. v. Bonnett Resources Corp. (In Re Meridian Reserve, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Power Lift, Inc. v. Weatherford Nipple-Up Systems, Inc., Gary D. Millspaugh and John D. Lohmann, Respondents/cross-Appellants, Apache CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Slyman v. Pickwick FarmsOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API