Legal Opinion

Hensarling v. Curtis Candy Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 30, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment non ob-stante veredicto.

After all of the testimony had been-adduced, the appellee moved for directed verdict which was denied, but thereafter the Court stated:

“I want to reserve my ruling for a directed verdict.”

This entire controversy revolves around three checks given by the appellant to the appellee which had been returned to the ap-pellee by the bank, upon which they were drawn, because of insufficient funds. The appellee was in possession of the checks which had been returned to it. The appellant claimed the checks had been paid. At the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudgins v. Florida Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Merry v. Danko, Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Lake County1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API