Commerce Union Bank v. Horton
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUMPHREYS, Justice.
This case is before the Court by certio-rari to the Court of Appeals. The administrator sued the bank to recover on a bank deposit. The bank pleaded the presumption of payment arising after the lapse of sixteen years. The trial judge recognized and applied the presumption. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial judge and awarded judgment. This Court granted certiorari, after full consideration, because it is of opinion the presumption of payment after the lapse of sixteen years applies to a deposit in a bank of this character : a deposit in a checking account.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Poole v. First Nat. Bank of SmyrnaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
- Insurance Co. v. DunscombTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Boscowitz v. Chase National BankCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
- Blackstone v. First National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- Anderson v. SettleTennessee Supreme Court · 1857
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pagano v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Pagano v. United Jersey BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Estes v. Woodlawn Memorial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
- Handy v. US Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008