Legal Opinion

(PS) Auten v. County of Calaveras

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 10, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01679Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD AUTEN, No. 2:19-cv-01679-JAM-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis 19 (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required 20 by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. 21 I.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API