Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 25, 1969No. 68-705PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANN, Judge.

Foster and Kirkland appeal from their conviction and sentence for breaking and entering a building with the intent to commit a felony, to-wit, grand larceny.

The appellants argue several different points for reversal. We have considered the various points which they raised and have found them to be without merit, except for the point alleging the insufficiency of competent, substantial evidence to prove the element of entering.

Fla.Stat. § 810.02, F.S.A. provides in pertinent part:

Jfi l}c * * * *

“Whoever breaks and enters any other building or any ship or vessel with intent to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PigquesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Bronson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. David BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. State v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
  4. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Stanley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API