Grossman v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Petitioner's income tax return was prepared for him by an attorney and accountant. Only petitioner's name appeared thereon as taxpayer and only he signed it. The tax was computed therein on the basis that it was a separate return. His wife had no income during the taxable year.
Read the full summary
Petitioner's income tax return was prepared for him by an attorney and accountant. Only petitioner's name appeared thereon as taxpayer and only he signed it. The tax was computed therein on the basis that it was a separate return. His wife had no income during the taxable year. In the return petitioner claimed dependency exemption on account of a "nephew" who was, in fact, the nephew of petitioner's wife, for whom petitioner had undertaken to provide maintenance and care by an agreement when the nephew was placed in petitioner's home for convalescent care. Held, petitioner's return was a…
1Opinion of the Court
Arthur Grossman, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Grossman v. Commissioner
Docket No. 53492
United States Tax Court
26 T.C. 234; 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 205;
April 30, 1956, Filed
Decision will be entered for the respondent.
Petitioner's income tax return was prepared for him by an attorney and accountant. Only petitioner's name appeared thereon as taxpayer and only he signed it. The tax was computed therein on the basis that it was a separate return. His wife had no income during the taxable year. In the return petitioner claimed dependency exemption on account of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harrison v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Grossman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956