Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 30, 1956No. Docket No. 53492Published

Petitioner's income tax return was prepared for him by an attorney and accountant. Only petitioner's name appeared thereon as taxpayer and only he signed it. The tax was computed therein on the basis that it was a separate return. His wife had no income during the taxable year.

Read the full summary

Petitioner's income tax return was prepared for him by an attorney and accountant. Only petitioner's name appeared thereon as taxpayer and only he signed it. The tax was computed therein on the basis that it was a separate return. His wife had no income during the taxable year. In the return petitioner claimed dependency exemption on account of a "nephew" who was, in fact, the nephew of petitioner's wife, for whom petitioner had undertaken to provide maintenance and care by an agreement when the nephew was placed in petitioner's home for convalescent care. Held, petitioner's return was a…

1Opinion of the Court

Arthur Grossman, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Grossman v. Commissioner

Docket No. 53492

United States Tax Court

26 T.C. 234; 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 205;

April 30, 1956, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Petitioner's income tax return was prepared for him by an attorney and accountant. Only petitioner's name appeared thereon as taxpayer and only he signed it. The tax was computed therein on the basis that it was a separate return. His wife had no income during the taxable year. In the return petitioner claimed dependency exemption on account of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  2. Grossman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API