Legal Opinion
Hoenig Plywood Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided July 24, 1963No. Reap. Dec. 10569; Entry No. 839964PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Judge:
In tliis appeal for reappraisement, plaintiff is seeking to upset a finding of dumping made by the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to the provisions of the Antidumping Act of 19211 (19 U.S.C., § 160 (May 27, 1921, ch. 14, §201, 42 Stat. 11; June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 651(d) (5), 46 Stat. 763)), and promulgated on August 26,1954, 89 Treas. Dec. 197, T.D. 53567, in respect to hardboard imported from Sweden. Said finding reads as follows:
*338Antidumping — Bardboard from Sweden
The Acting Secretary of the Treasury makes a finding of dumping with respect to hardboard…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hotch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Roger Aarons and Robert SwannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Jordan v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Hoenig Plywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Huaiyang Hongda Dehydrated Vegetable Co. v. United StateserUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004