Legal Opinion

In re the insolvency of Union Bank

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On exceptions to master’s report on the receiver’s account.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The receiver was appointed January 20th, 1875. He filed no inventory. The nominal assets were about $300,000, of which $166,000 consisted of discounted commercial paper, unmatured;, about $86,000 of such paper past due, and about $48,000 of stocks, furniture, cash &o. The liabilities were about $100,000 due depositors, and $36,000 due other banks. Pursuant to the order of this court, the receiver made and paid three dividends, the *421first of fifty per cent., the second of twenty-five per cent, and the third of ten per cent.—in all, amounting to eighty-five per cent, of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borden v. Wolf Silk Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. In Re KraeuterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1939
  3. Ballard v. Park Place Land Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API